This example shows how the "fibonacciness" factor affects the weighting of font sizes between the same range.

H1 500%

skiponacci(6, 0): 1 2 4 8 16 32

H2 293.5%

H3 190.3%

H4 138.7%

H5 112.9%

skiponacci(6, 1): 1 2 3 5 8 13

H2 333.3%

H3 233.3%

H4 166.7%

H5 133.3%

skiponacci(6, 2): 1 2 3 4 6 9

H2 350%

H3 250%

H4 200%

H5 150%

skiponacci(6, 3): 1 2 3 4 5 7

H2 366.7%

H3 300%

H4 233.3%

H5 166.7%

skiponacci(6, 4): 1 2 3 4 5 6

H2 420%

H3 340%

H4 260%

H5 180%
H6 100%